Evaluation of the TCIS Influence on the capacity utilization using the TOPSIS method: Case studies of Serbian and Austrian railways

  • Evelin Krmac University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport
  • Boban Djordjević University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport
Keywords: Evaluation, Train Control Information System, Railway, Capacity, Multicriteria Decision Making

Abstract

Increasing of train traffic on railway infrastructure implies the use of enlarged railway network capacity and the corresponding increase in intelligence - i.e. “intelligentization” - of railway industries. As the Train Control Information System (TCIS) results as one of the most important railway systems with a significant impact on overall railway performance is very important to be able to evaluate its efficiency and influence on railway infrastructure capacity (RIC). In this paper, the model for evaluation of the influence of TCIS on capacity utilization, based on the TOPSIS method is proposed as an alternative to DEA based models. Indeed, the main drawback of DEA based models is that DEA evaluates the alternatives from only one point of view and classifies them as efficient or inefficient, while TOPSIS allows the benchmarking of the alternatives by detecting the best practices based on the ranking of alternatives. For the purposes of this paper, the TOPSIS based evaluation where years represent alternatives were tested through case studies of Serbian and Austrian railways for the period from 2006 to 2015. Based on the obtained results it can be pointed out that TOPSIS method can be applied for the evaluation and comparison of the influence of different TCIS on RC utilization.

References

Aydin, N. (2017). A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems. Transport Policy, 55, 87–98.

Bababeik, M., Khadem, N., & Chen, A. (2018). Increasing the resilience level of a vulnerable rail network: The strategy of location and allocation of emergency relief trains. Transportation Research Part E, 119, 110-128.

Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, K. S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 13051–13069. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056

Bevrani, B. (2015). Capacity Determination and Expansion Models for Rail Networks . Queensland University of Technology.

Boysen, H. E. (2012). General model of railway transportation capacity. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 127.

Chen, S., Leng, Y., Mao, B., & Liu, S. (2014). Integrated weight-based multi-criteria evaluation on transfer in large transport terminals: A case study of the Beijing South Railway Station. Transportation Research Part A, 66, 13-26.

Delgarm, N., Sajadi, B., & Delgarm, S. (2016). Multi-objective optimization of building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort: A new method using artificial bee colony (ABC). Energy and Buildings, 131, 42-53. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.003

Djordjević, B., & Krmac, E. (2018). Application of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods in Railway Engineering: A Case Study of Train Control Information Systems (TCIS). In A. Hessami, Modern Railway Engineering (pp. 153-185). Rijeka: INTECH.

European Commission. (2016). Commission Staff Working Document: A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility. Brussels: European Commission.

Fantechi, A., Flammini, F., & Gnesi, S. (2014). Formal methods for railway control systems. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 16, 643-646.

Huang, W., Shuai, B., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., & Antwi, E. (2018). Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case. Transportation Research Part A, 111, 292-303.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin.

Jahantigh, M., Lotfi, H. F., & Moghaddas, Z. (2013). Ranking of DMUs by using TOPSIS and different ranking models in DEA. International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 5(3), 217-225.
Janic, M. (2003). Multicriteria Evaluation of High-speed Rail, Transrapid Maglev and Air Passenger Transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26(6), 491-512.

Jinbao, R., & Xing, Z. (2014). Fault Criticality Evaluation of Metro Door based on modified FMEA. Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference. Nanjing, China.

Krmac, E., & Djordjevic, B. (2017). An evaluation of train control information systems for sustainable railway using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model. European Transportation Research Review, 9-35. doi:10.1007/s12544-017-0253-9

Lotfi, H. F., Fallahnejad, R., & Navidi, N. (2011). Ranking Efficient Units in DEA by Using TOPSIS Method. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 5(17), 805-815.

Melody, K. S. (2012). Railway Track Capacity: Measuring and Managing. University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment.

Nystrom, B. (2009). Use of Availability Concepts in the Railway System. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 5(2), 103-118.

OBB. (2016). OBB in numbers: We move Austria forward.

Patra, A. P., Kumar, U., & Kraik, P.-O. L. (2010). Availability target of the railway infrastructure: an analysis. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). doi:10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448035

Wang, B., Nistor, I., Murty, T., & Wei, Y.-M. (2014). Efficiency assessment of hydroelectric power plants in Canada: A multi criteria decision making approach. Energy Economics, 46, 112-121. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.001.

Whitman, M. G., Barker, K., Johansson, J., & Darayi, M. (2017). Component importance for multi-commodity networks: Application in the Swedish railway. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 274-288.

Zhao, L., Zhao, Y., Hu, Q., Li, H., & Stoeter, J. (2018). Evaluation of consolidation center cargo capacity and locations for China railway express. Transportation Research Part E, 117, 58-81.
Published
2019-03-19
How to Cite
Krmac, E., & Djordjević, B. (2019). Evaluation of the TCIS Influence on the capacity utilization using the TOPSIS method: Case studies of Serbian and Austrian railways. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 27-36. Retrieved from http://www.oresta.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/16